Related Articles

More

Related Categories

More

Recently Added

More

Solar Energy Los Angeles

Lester Said:

charge tenants for solar energy?

We Answered:

I doubt it. You would need a business license to sell the power and some way to measure what you are selling.

Joe Said:

New York, Chicago, or Los Angeles?

We Answered:

i say Chicago cuz i live here haha. but i do think chicago would be good because theres alot of different cultures here.

Everett Said:

Utility bills for Los Angeles residents to go up by 28% to help fund renewables - happy with that?

We Answered:

Actually, I am quite happy that their energy bills are going up. They will lose more businesses as they increase the cost of businesses to operate. Their unemployment will skyrocket and very soon CA is going to serve as a warning to the rest of the country as to why you do not follow the liberal tree-huggers. We are already seeing the effect of all of their stupidity and arrogance. They are feeling the affects of the smug storm that they have generated. Their green jobs are not exactly saving them, are they? Their cost of living is high, their state taxes are some of the highest in the nation, their unemployment is high, their school systems are ranked #46 amongst states (that's below Louisiana!), their government is huge. Still you have Dana, preaching about how not teaching AGW is going to hurt Texas schools (ranked # 24) as if the liberalized, teach issues instead of scientific principles, has helped CA schools. We have been worried that an earthquake will take out California, but it is quite clear they are going to take themselves out. Not that I wish ill to the californians, but this can serve as a wake up call to everyone. WAKE UP!!!!!!! DO YOU WANT TO BE LIKE CA? CAP AND TRADE IS GOING TO DO THE SAME THING ACROSS THE US!!!

Pegminer,
When CA goes broke, don't come to the great state of Texas. We don't want your kind screwing up our economy as well.

Also changes in precipitation patterns? Have you lost your mind? CA has problems with water supply due to the large population, not changes in the precipitation patterns. Further, if these chnges are to place more H2O into the atmosphere as predicted, then CA should see more rainfall. Love how you take a problem already know to exist, one that already has a known cause and use it for AGW. I really can't touch that scientific acumen.

Pegminer,
Are you trying to make me laugh? I almost spit up my coke when I read your insipid tripe. You suggest that if a place is having water shortages, no matter if it can be explained by other factors, it must AGW, but if they are having floods, no matter if it can be explained by other factors, it must be AGW. If this logic is what passes for science with you, then you are right I have no knowledge of your brand of science.

Discuss It!