Related Articles

More

Related Categories

More

Recently Added

More

Solar Energy Conference

Johnnie Said:

Do U prefer Gore/Obama One WorldOrder carbon tax totalitarian communist regime, or a free America back again?

We Answered:

´Live free or die!

I am a resister....Let resist the cancer spreading throughout our country.

Death to the NWO!

Mario Said:

Creation in the Bible vs. Science?

We Answered:

1In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

2And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Earth was created first yes; but it wasn't in the form we know it as today, it plainly says "without form and void"....it was void. Who's to say this isn't this star that exploded and was cooling.

10And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.

11And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

12And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

13And the evening and the morning were the third day.

14And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

15And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

16And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.


Now v. 3And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

4And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.

5And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day

okay, let me try to explain this:
Before the sun was even formed GOD SPOKE light into existence. God is that He is. He doesn't 'need' something to put off light, He is all powerful....HE IS THE LIGHT as Jesus said "I am the light of the world" this doesn't mean He IS the sun.....
Now, this light is what nurtured the earth. Just as GOD put breath into our nostrils to bring life (soul-life-existence) He provided the light for the plant.

Now unto the two lights you refer to.
He said LESSER light. This doesn't mean 'a light shining on its own'...it was the lesser of two. In Biblical days, or now, a servant is the 'lesser' of two. Serving another. This is what the moon is. A servant to the sun, the lesser of the two.

Hope I answered your questions.

Emma Said:

what do you think about Predicting Apophis' Earth Encounters in 2029 and 2036 ?

We Answered:

too... much ... reading...

did you mention anywhere in there that Apophis is only about 200 meters in diameter?

i think its gonna miss.

Daniel Said:

can u suggest some working models which are energy efficient or use any new source of energy?

We Answered:

in future we would have to adopt not only a single method but instead we have to adopt a chian processes which interlinked each other
for eg
we can collect whole of city garbage at a place and cover it via some plastic sheet(sheets can be extracted from garbage itself) and then let it spoil for some days
after some days we will get methane gas out of it
this gas will not escape in atmostphere due to plastic covering

this methane gas can be burned in generators in place of natural gas
burning methane give pure hot water and co2
this hot water is used as per needs
and co2 can be supplied in industries where it is needed
and if not then it can be suppled in organic bio fuel farms
where this co2 will be dissolved in water and will be used up in photosynthesis of algae to get bio fuel

Judy Said:

Do you agree with American CEOs who want stronger regulations on climate change?

We Answered:

Yes! Lets invest in America again. There is nothing more expensive than continuing to do what we are doing.
There are estimates as high as $800 billion annually for the hidden costs of oil and gas in the U.S. That would add $8 to a gallon of gasoline if you paid it at the pump. Oil accounts for up to $300 billion annually of our trade imbalance.
Oil and gas subsidies and tax credits are costing us up to $80 billion annually. The cost of military protection of oil shipments are estimated as high as $100 billion annually. Environmenal and health costs are hundreds of billions.
And then there is all the world conflict associated with oil. We're finding out what that costs.

Something like this proposal published by Scientific American could be done using 1/4 as much public money as we now give oil and gas companies annually.

Scientific American A Solar Grand Plan
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-so…


from Green Wombat
"The United States could lose more than 116,000 green collar jobs and forgo $19 billion in green tech investment in 2009 if Congress fails to extend two tax credits crucial to the renewable energy industry, according to a new study."

"In recent months, PG&E has signed deals for more than a gigawatt of electricity — enough to light more than 750,000 homes — with solar power plant developers. Such power purchase agreements can take more than a year to hammer out and the permitting and construction of a solar power station can take another three to five years."

"The solar thermal industry is in its infancy but utilities like PG&E (PCG), Southern California Edison (EIX) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SRE) have signed several contracts for solar power plants and negotiations for gigawatts more of solar electricity are ongoing."

"The first solar power plants in California won't go online until around 2010 but the construction and operation of those projects are expected to create thousands of jobs. Like the PV industry, solar thermal companies are dependent on the investment tax credit to attract the big money it takes to finance the construction of billion-dollar power plants. The loss of the investment tax credit would hit California particularly hard."

"Navigant projects an even bigger crash for the wind industry should the production tax credit expire, with installations falling from 6,500 megawatts to 500 megawatts in 2009 with the lose of 76,800 jobs. The wind industry has been continuously buffeted in recent years as Congress has allowed the production tax credit to expire repeatedly only to resuscitate it. In the past, the expiration of the tax credit has resulted in a 73% to 93% drop in the wind market, according to Navigant."

"Representatives from Silicon Valley tech giants, Wall Street investment banks and utilities signed a letter sent to the congressional leadership late Wednesday urging the long-term extension of the 30 percent investment tax credit as well as the production tax credit for the electricity produced by solar, wind, geothermal and other renewable energy systems. Among the signers urging action by March 1 are executives from Google (GOOG), Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), Applied Materials (AMAT), Credit Suisse (CS), Wells Fargo (WFC), venture capitalists Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and utility San Diego Gas & Electric, a subsidiary of energy giant Sempra (SRE)."
Posted by Todd Woody
http://blogs.business2.com/greenwombat/

Here's what solar can do.
"Solar thermal power plants such as Ausra's generate electricity by driving steam turbines with sunshine. Ausra's solar concentrators boil water with focused sunlight, and produce electricity at prices directly competitive with gas- and coal-fired electric power."

"Solar is one the most land-efficient sources of clean power we have, using a fraction of the area needed by hydro or wind projects of comparable output. All of America's needs for electric power – the entire US grid, night and day – can be generated with Ausra's current technology using a square parcel of land 92 miles on a side. For comparison, this is less than 1% of America's deserts, less land than currently in use in the U.S. for coal mines."

http://www.ausra.com

Wind has big potential as well. And is cost effective.

"Estimates of the cost to construct nuclear power plants are as high as $4,000 per kilowatt, as compared to about $1,400 per kilowatt for wind projects."

http://www.cleanwisconsin.org/campaigns/…

Doing these things will improve the economy, not harm it. Sure there will be some disruptions and adjustment, but the alternative is unthinkable.

Andrea Said:

can someone please help me find rhetorical devices in the following text please!!!!!!!?

We Answered:

Your problem is that you don't know what "rhetorical devices" are. Check the dictionary and encyclopedia at www.dictionary.com or a similar site, then go over the writing again. You'll recognize a bunch of them!

Dave Said:

Who says Republicans are aloof to Alternative Energy? I attended a conference at my state capitol on solar....

We Answered:

No respectable Republican will turn down a buck. It's interesting that TBone Pickens is investing in wind turbines.

I which I could see your figures on solar. Is it the thin film solar cells that is making it cost effective?

I know - wrong section for that.

PS Kyoto s**ks. No other way to put it.

Discuss It!